| Yazarlar (3) |
Doç. Dr. Cihan KAYMAZ
Gümüşhane Üniversitesi, Türkiye |
Gürdal Tut
|
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Aliye Bilge CERTEL
Kafkas Üniversitesi, Türkiye |
| Özet |
| The hot debate about 3rd Bosphorus Bridge that has planned since 1987 and started process of its building has gained new dimensions. Temporary Article 3 of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIS) regulations doesn’t examine several investments that may destruct the ecology like 3rd Bosphorus Bridge, isn’t removed from regulations in spite of the decision to cancel of the judiciary. This article is out of scope for the investments and facilities that were built before 23rd of June 1997 by adding Temporary Article 3 to Law of Environment. The EIS, which is one of the apparatus of the sustainability that were discharged by the neoliberal saving process, has two sources of legitimacy. First it has the characteristics of a scientific report (ideological apparatus) and second it is legitimate. EIS as a scientific report is a research and an examination that reveals negative results and searches the social, economic, political … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| Bildiri Türü | Tebliğ/Bildiri |
| Bildiri Alt Türü | Özet Metin Olarak Yayınlanan Tebliğ (Uluslararası Kongre/Sempozyum) |
| Bildiri Niteliği | Alanında Hakemli Uluslararası Kongre/Sempozyum |
| Bildiri Dili | Türkçe |
| Kongre Adı | Uluslararası XI. Kamu Yönetimi Forumu (KAYFOR XI) |
| Kongre Tarihi | 31-10-2013 / 02-11-2013 |
| Basıldığı Ülke | Türkiye |
| Basıldığı Şehir | Samsun |
