Academic and Non Academic Staff s Psychological Contract in Turkey
Yazarlar (5)
Prof. Dr. Kürşad Yılmaz Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Hasan Basri Memduhoğlu Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Ebru Oğuz Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Sabri GÜNGÖR Kafkas Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Makale Türü Özgün Makale (SCOPUS dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale)
Dergi Adı HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY
Dergi ISSN 0951-5224 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler Academic Search (EBSCO Publishing) Academic Search Premier (EBSCO Publishing) British Education Index (EBSCO Publishing) CSA Biological Sciences Database (ProQuest) CSA Environmental Sciences Pollution Management Database (ProQuest) Ecology Abstracts (ProQuest) Education Index/Abstracts (EBSCO Publishing) ERA: Educational Research Abstracts Online (TF) ERIC: Educational Resources Information Center (CSC) International Political Science Abstracts (IPSA) OmniFile Full Text Mega Edition (HW Wilson) PAIS: Public Affairs Information Service (ProQuest) ProQuest Central (ProQuest) ProQuest Education Journals (ProQuest) Research into Higher Education Abstracts (TF) SCOPUS (Elsevier) Social Services Abstracts (ProQuest) Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest) Sociological Collection (EBSCO Publishing) Worldwide Political Sciences Abstracts (ProQuest)
Makale Dili İngilizce Basım Tarihi 07-2008
Kabul Tarihi Yayınlanma Tarihi 01-07-2008
Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa 62 / 3 / 252–272 DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00394.x
Makale Linki http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00394.x
UAK Araştırma Alanları
Eğitim Yönetimi
Özet
AbstractStudies of psychological contract as part of organisation‐individual agreements have become important in recent years. This study determines views, about the psychological contract, of academic and non‐academic staff and managers in faculties of education in Turkey. A total of 442 employees at 11 state universities in Turkey were included in the research. ‘Psychological Contract Inventory’ and ‘Psychological Contract Measures’, designed by Rousseau were utilised during the development process of the data‐gathering tool. After the adaptation work, the scale consisted of 68 items under three sections and seven subscales. The results showed that academic staff and executives considered that their university carried out its obligations towards the staff at a ‘moderate’ level, whereas the non‐academic staff considered it ‘insufficient’. The academic and the non‐academic staff considered that the employees carried out their tasks at a ‘maximum’ level, whereas the executives considered it ‘moderate’.
Anahtar Kelimeler
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
Atıf Sayıları
Web of Science 8
Academic and Non Academic Staff s Psychological Contract in Turkey

Paylaş