A Comparison of the Entrepreneurial Performance of Asian-Oceanian Countries via the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques of Critic, Aras, Waspas, Mairca and Borda Count Methods
Yazarlar (4)
Katarzyna Szymczyk
Doç. Dr. Ceyda YERDELEN KAYGIN Kafkas Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Makale Türü Açık Erişim Özgün Makale (SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale)
Dergi Adı Acta Polytechnica Hungarica (Q2)
Dergi ISSN 1785-8860 Dergi Bilgileri (2023)
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler SCI-Expanded
Makale Dili Türkçe Basım Tarihi 01-2023
Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa 20 / 3 / 65–81 DOI 10.12700/aph.20.3.2023.3.5
Makale Linki http://dx.doi.org/10.12700/aph.20.3.2023.3.5
UAK Araştırma Alanları
Finansal Piyasalar ve Kurumlar Davranışsal Finans
Özet
The significance of entrepreneurial activities, in the development of a country, has been increasing at an exponential rate, since the former variable has been repeatedly proven to have a vital effect on economic growth. Within this context, countries periodically publish data related to entrepreneurial activities and undertake regulations that incentivize such pursuits, within their jurisdictions. In light of this, the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, was constructed to measure and evaluate the countries’ level of global entrepreneurship and the ability and hence, the success of entrepreneurial firms’ in developing and producing outputs of high quality. In this sense, one can state that the capacity of the aspects that constitute the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor to complement each other plays a vital role in countries’ improvement of their entrepreneurial performances. Taking all these into consideration, this study takes into account the Global Entrepreneurship Indicators; tries to identify via the Multi Criteria Decision Making Method their relative importance levels for 34 countries sampled from Asia-Oceania; ranks
Anahtar Kelimeler