Analysis of stone-free rates and residual fragment sizes following standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: mistakes in the treatment of non-opaque kidney stones
Yazarlar (6)
Doç. Dr. Ümit YILDIRIM Kafkas Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Kemal Sarıca Biruni Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Mehmet EZER Kafkas Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Mehmet USLU Kafkas Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi İsmet Bilger ERİHAN Kafkas Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Cengiz Kara Kafkas Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü | Özgün Makale (SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale) | ||
| Dergi Adı | Urolithiasis (Q2) | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 2194-7228 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | SCI-Expanded | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 04-2023 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 51 / 1 / 69–0 | DOI | 10.1007/s00240-023-01448-0 |
| Makale Linki | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01448-0 | ||
| Özet |
| Our presented study aimed to evaluate the possible effects of stone opacity, on both the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and the sizes of residual fragments following the procedure. Medical records of patients undergoing PCNL treatment for kidney stones at our clinic between July 2014 and May 2022 were evaluated in a retrospective manner. A total sample size of 304 patients with the required criteria was included. Patients were divided into two groups based on the radiopacity status of the stones assessed in the kidney-ureter-bladder graphy (KUB) [Group O (n = 211): opaque, Group N (n = 93): non-opaque)]. Demographic data, laboratory results, and surgical follow-up information were comparatively evaluated between groups. The mean age and percentage of female patients were higher in Group N (45.2 vs. 25,1%; p < 0.001). Also, patients in this group were associated with more … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| Standard | Percutaneous | Nephrolithotomy | Non-opaque | Mistakes |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Google Scholar | 4 |
| Web of Science | 4 |