| Yazarlar (1) |
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Mehmet EZER
Kafkas Üniversitesi, Türkiye |
| Özet |
| We have read with great interest the recent article titled “Physician vs. AI-generated messages in urology: evaluation of accuracy, completeness, and preference by patients and physicians” by Robinson et al.[1]. This well-conducted study provides valuable insights into the potential integration of AI-driven chatbots for clinical communication in urology, particularly for common benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related patient questions. While the authors highlight significant findings regarding the comparative performance of chatbots and human urologists in terms of accuracy, completeness, and tone, we believe that additional factors influencing chatbot responses warrant further discussion.Firstly, the study primarily evaluates chatbot outputs based on a standardized set of BPH-related questions. However, it does not explore how variations in prompt design affect the quality of responses. It is well established in … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| Makale Türü | Diğer (Teknik, not, yorum, vaka takdimi, editöre mektup, özet, kitap krıtiği, araştırma notu, bilirkişi raporu ve benzeri) |
| Makale Alt Türü | SCI, SSCI, AHCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan teknik not, editöre mektup, tartışma, vaka takdimi ve özet türünden makale |
| Dergi Adı | WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY |
| Dergi ISSN | 0724-4983 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi |
| Makale Dili | İngilizce |
| Basım Tarihi | 01-2025 |
| Cilt No | 43 |
| Sayı | 1 |
| Sayfalar | 88 / 0 |
| Doi Numarası | 10.1007/s00345-025-05449-z |
| Atıf Sayıları |
