Do the urolithiasis scoring systems predict the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in cases with anatomical abnormalities?
Yazarlar (10)
Prof. Dr. Ramazan KOCAASLAN Kafkas Üniversitesi, Türkiye
İbrahim Buldu İstanbul Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Muhammed Tosun Bezm-İ Âlem Vakıf Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Mehmet Mazhar Utanğaç Uludağ Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Ekrem Özyuvalı
Namık Kemal Hatipoğlu
Dicle Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Ali Ünsal Gazi Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Kemal Sarıca Yeditepe Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Makale Türü Özgün Makale (SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale)
Dergi Adı Urolithiasis
Dergi ISSN 2194-7228 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler SCI-Expanded
Makale Dili İngilizce Basım Tarihi 07-2016
Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa 30 / 7 / 765–770 DOI 10.1007/s00240-016-0903-8
Makale Linki http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00240-016-0903-8
Özet
The objective of this study is to assess the utility of the Guy, S.T.O.N.E., and CROES nephrolithometry scoring systems (SS), and compare the capability of each system to predict percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) outcome in patients with anatomical abnormalities. We retrospectively collected medical records of patients with anatomical abnormalities who underwent PNL for the treatment of renal calculi by experienced surgical teams in four referral centers. All of the patients were graded by a single observer from each department based on preoperative computed tomography images using each SS. Patient demographics and outcomes were compared according to the complexity of the procedure as graded by each scoring system. A total of 137 cases with anatomical abnormalities [horseshoe kidney (n = 46), malrotation (n = 33), kypho and/or scoliosis (n = 31) and ectopic kidney (n = 27)] were assessed …
Anahtar Kelimeler
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
Atıf Sayıları
Google Scholar 19
Web of Science 11
Scopus 13
Do the urolithiasis scoring systems predict the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in cases with anatomical abnormalities?

Paylaş