A comparative analysis of two different decision-making methods in neutrosophic soft rough set environments
Yazarlar (2)
Aysun Benek
Prof. Dr. Taha Yasin ÖZTÜRK Kafkas Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü | Özgün Makale (Uluslararası alan indekslerindeki dergilerde yayınlanan tam makale) | ||
| Dergi Adı | OPSEARCH | ||
| Makale Dili | – | Basım Tarihi | 09-2025 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 0 / 0 / 1–22 | DOI | 10.1007/s12597-025-01018-5 |
| Makale Linki | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12597-025-01018-5 | ||
| UAK Araştırma Alanları |
Topoloji
|
||
| Özet |
| Neutrosophic soft rough sets are a valuable mathematical tool for dealing with uncertainty, inconsistency and ambiguity. The aim of this paper is to develop new decision-making methods to deal with uncertainties in real-world problems using neutrosophic soft rough sets. First, this paper defines several concepts used in decision-making methods on neutrosophic soft rough sets, including neutrosophic soft rough matrices, neutrosophic soft rough numbers, sum of neutrosophic soft rough numbers, cumulative geometric operators, discriminant measures and ranking concepts. Furthermore, using these newly defined concepts, we develop two different algorithms for decision-making methods. First, we introduce the multi-criteria decision-making method (MCDM) to determine the best option among several alternatives. In this method, we present an algorithm that uses the sum operator and ranking concepts associated … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Google Scholar | 4 |